Contact Paul +

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.
New Ways & Means leadership tasked with tax extender legislation

Less than a day after winning the post recently vacated by new House Speaker Paul Ryan (R-WI), new Ways and Means Committee Chairman Kevin Brady (R-TX) was called on by major industry groups to address tax extenders. This year, like last, these temporary tax provisions have been expired for almost a year, making it difficult not only to engage in forward-looking tax planning but also forcing individuals and businesses to game out their finances for the current year under a variety of different scenarios reflecting the possible actions (or lack thereof) that could take place before year-end. This article provides an overview of extenders and some background on Chairman Brady that may shed some light on how he will choose to address them.

Note: Most tax extender provisions were most recently extended by the Tax Increase Prevention Act of 2014 (TIPA) after they had been expired for most of a year. The prior extension, by the 2012 Taxpayer Relief Act, occurred after most of the provisions had been expired for over a year. In this respect, some of the justifications underlying the provisions (e.g., to boost the economy by encouraging certain types of purchasing during the tax year) grow weaker as we get later in the year and, in cases of retroactive passage, amount more to good fortune to those who made correct assumptions or otherwise happened to engage in such behavior.

Debate over extenders. In general, a main point of contention regarding extenders has been whether they should simply be re-extended on a cumulative basis to give taxpayers greater certainty, and then given a closer look on an individual basis as part of comprehensive tax reform—which has proven to be easier said than done—or whether each provision should be evaluated on its merits prior to any extension. One reason given for the most recent 1-year extension was to allow lawmakers the time to engage in more analysis to deal with the extenders in a more substantive way rather than another blanket extension. However, while most parties seem to agree that extenders should ideally be addressed as part of greater tax reform efforts, there seems to be little that is agreed upon beyond that.

Another issue with extenders is paying for them. Although there are a number of reasons that Congress may choose to enact provisions on a temporary basis—such as to provide temporary economic stimulus or test-drive a provision before making it permanent—in most cases, the main rationale is based on the way in which these provisions are taken into account for budgetary forecasting purposes. When a provision is temporary, regardless of whether it is routinely extended, its monetary impact is only reflected for the time it is scheduled to be in effect.

Political climate. The recent ascension of Paul Ryan to House Speaker will certainly have some effect on tax reform—although whether it improves or weakens the odds is debatable. He is known as a major advocate for tax reform in contrast to his predecessor John Boehner (R-OH), who famously reacted to a comprehensive tax plan submitted by Rep. Dave Camp (R-MI) by saying “blah, blah, blah.” So, while tax reform may be a major item on Speaker Ryan’s agenda, assuming such a major leadership role will likely take at least some of his attention away from the actual mechanics of it. Also, while there appears to be general support in favor of tax reform on both sides of the aisle, politics are likely to dictate that major reforms will wait until after next year’s election.

Chairman Brady seems eager to continue where Paul Ryan left off, stating that he was “honor[ed] to lead this talented committee as House Republicans continue to advance Speaker Paul Ryan’s pro-growth agenda” and “ready to hit the ground running.” On his website, Chairman Brady has a section devoted to tax reform, decrying the current system as “too costly, complex, and unfair,” and “full of loopholes and deductions that benefit special interests.” His vision for a pro-growth tax Code is one that is “simpler, fairer, flatter”; “closes loopholes & limits deductions”; and “stops forcing companies to shift jobs overseas.”

He has already indicated that making “key” extenders permanent is a priority for the Committee. With respect to the extender provisions below, Chairman Brady lists among his tax achievements fighting to restore the state and local sales tax deduction, which was repealed in ’86 and which he states is “unfair to taxpayers in states that do not have a state income tax.” He has submitted a bill to make that deduction permanent. In addition, he also authored a bill that would permanently extend and modify the research and development credit.

Business industry groups didn’t waste any time in calling on Chairman Brady to address tax extenders, urging him in a letter to “make tax extenders his immediate priority upon taking over as leader of the committee.” The letter, from the “Broad Tax Extenders Coalition,” on behalf of groups including the Business Roundtable and National Association of Manufacturers, included comments about the impact of temporary provisions and emphasized the need for stability and predictability.

Earlier actions on extenders. In addition to the specific Brady initiatives mentioned above, there have been a number of actions taken this year to address extenders, although thus far none have seriously advanced.

Back in September, the Ways and Means Committee approved bills that would permanently extend: the above-the-line deduction for certain expenses of elementary and secondary school teachers, and further index the $250 amount for inflation (H.R. 2940); the 15-year recovery period for qualified leasehold improvement, restaurant, and retail improvement property (H.R. 765); bonus depreciation (with certain modifications) (H.R. 2510); the subpart F exemption for active financing income (H.R. 961); and the look-through treatment of payments between related controlled foreign corporations (H.R. 1430).

There have been a number of other bills introduced to make specific extender provisions permanent, including a number of charitable provisions (H.R. 644), the reduced recognition period for built-in gains of S corporations (H.R. 629), and certain rules regarding basis adjustments to stock of S corporations that make charitable contributions of property (H.R. 639).

President Obama, despite having expressed support for a number of these provisions, has threatened to veto several bills to make extender provisions permanent for lack of offset (i.e., failure to indicate how permanent extenders would be paid for).

In addition, back in July, the Senate Finance Committee favorably reported out of committee the Chairman’s mark of a bill to extend 52 expired provisions. In contrast to the Ways and Means bills discussed above, this took an all-or-nothing approach to extenders, treating them essentially as a package, and provided for a 2-year extension as opposed to making any of them permanent.

Expired provisions. Following are the provisions at issue, expired as of Dec. 31, 2014, arranged by subject matter. Note that TIPA also extended a number of provisions that aren’t typically categorized as extenders (e.g., empowerment zone designations, qualified zone academy bond limitation), which are generally beyond the scope of this article but could potentially be dealt with similarly going forward.

Expired individual provisions include:

  • Deduction for state and local sales taxes (Code Sec. 164(b)(5));
  • $250 above-the-line deduction for certain expenses of teachers (Code Sec. 62(a)(2)(D));
  • Above-the-line deduction for qualified tuition and related expenses (Code Sec. 222);
  • Deduction for mortgage insurance premiums treated as qualified interest (Code Sec. 163);
  • Parity for exclusion for employer-provided mass transit and parking benefits (Code Sec. 132(f)); and
  • Exclusion of up to $2 million ($1 million if married filing separately) of discharged principal residence indebtedness from gross income; (Code Sec. 108).
  • Credit for certain health insurance costs (Code Sec. 35(a)).

Expired business provisions include:

  • Research and experimentation credit (Code Sec. 41);
  • Work opportunity tax credit (Code Sec. 51, Code Sec. 52);
  • Increase in expensing to $500,000 and in investment based phaseout amount to $2 million and expanded definition of Section 179 property (Code Sec. 179);
  • 50% bonus depreciation (Code Sec. 168(k));
  • Exceptions under Subpart F for active financing income (Code Sec. 953, Code Sec. 954);
  • Look-through treatment of payments between controlled foreign corporations (Code Sec. 954(c)(6));
  • Special treatment of certain dividends of regulated investment companies (RICs) (Code Sec. 871(k));
  • Employer wage credit for activated military reservists (Code Sec. 45P);
  • Special expensing rules for film and television production (Code Sec. 181(f));
  • Special 100% gain exclusion for qualified small business stock (Code Sec. 1202);
  • Reduction in S corporation recognition period for built-in gains tax (Code Sec. 1374);
  • Election to accelerate alternative minimum tax (AMT) credits in lieu of additional first-year depreciation (Code Sec. 168(k));
  • Low-income housing 9% credit rate freeze (extended for allocations made before Jan. 1, 2016) (Code Sec. 42);
  • Treatment of military basic housing allowances under low-income housing credit (Code Sec. 42, Code Sec. 142);
  • 15-year straight line cost recovery for qualified leasehold property, qualified restaurant property, and qualified retail improvements (Code Sec. 168(e)(3)(E));
  • 7-year writeoff for motorsport racing track facilities (Code Sec. 168(i)(15)(D));
  • Deduction allowable with respect to income attributable to domestic production activities in Puerto Rico (Code Sec. 199);
  • Modification of tax treatment of certain payments to controlling exempt organizations (Code Sec. 512);
  • Accelerated depreciation for business property on Indian reservations (Code Sec. 168(j)); and
  • Indian employment credit (Code Sec. 45A).

Expired charitable provisions include:

  • Enhanced charitable deduction for contributions of food inventory (Code Sec. 170);
  • Tax-free distributions for charitable purposes from individual retirement accounts (IRAs) of taxpayers age 70 1/2 or older (Code Sec. 408(d)(8));
  • Basis adjustment to stock of S corporations making charitable contributions of property (Code Sec. 1367); and
  • Special rules for contributions of capital gain real property for conservation purposes (Code Sec. 170(b)(1)(E), Code Sec. 170(b)(2)(B)).

Expired energy provisions include:

  • Credit for construction of energy efficient new homes (Code Sec. 45L);
  • Energy efficient commercial building deduction (Code Sec. 179D(h));
  • Construction date for eligible facilities to claim the production tax credit or wind credit (Code Sec. 45(d));
  • Credit for nonbusiness energy property (Code Sec. 25C);
  • Alternative fuel vehicle refueling property (Code Sec. 30C);
  • Incentives for alternative fuel and alternative fuel mixtures (Code Sec. 6426);
  • Incentives for biodiesel and renewable diesel (Code Sec. 40A, Code Sec. 6426);
  • Second generation biofuel producer credit (Code Sec. 40(b)(6)(H)); and
  • production credit for Indian coal facilities (Code Sec. 45(e)(10)).

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Time limit is exhausted. Please reload CAPTCHA.

Meet Paul Raymond

Meet Paul Raymond

Mr. Raymond is a sought after speaker in tax controversy law by many attorney, accountant, and business groups and at the request of the Internal Revenue Service, has presented programs at the IRS Nationwide Tax Forum, attended by tax professionals throughout the United States.

Additionally, he continues to be an active member in the Section of Taxation, American Bar Association, where he was the Past Chair of the Employment Taxes Committee.

Read More

Connect With Paul on Social Media

Practice Areas & Information

Certifications &
Member CA Bar Member Orange County Bar US Tax Court Attorney